More Tall Tales from London Town
In August Chris Sumner wrote
A recent trip to Covent Garden to see Simone Boccanegra led me to wonder whether there were parallels between the struggle for power between the Patricians and Plebeians of mediaeval Italy and those of modern London, and whether Harrison Birtwhistle might do for Boris and Ken what Verdi did for the sparring Doges of Genoa.
Any parallels of irregular love lives, ruthless egos and (character) assassination of the protagonists are perhaps better not explored, but high buildings were an issue in San Gimignano, where each family vied to build higher than its neighbour, and the civic life and the traffic of Siena were and still are disrupted by the annual Paglio horse race.
London has its high buildings threats and its prospective Olympic equestrian events, so some things remain evergreen. Boris Johnson seems less ready than his predecessor to subscribe to the myth that every attractive park and river vista in London would be enhanced by a disproportionately tall new building, and the Richmond Park Conservatives' newsletter carries the encouraging headline BORIS BACKS THE VIEW..
"The iconic keyhole view of St Paul's Cathedral from King Henry's Mound in Richmond Park has been reprieved and will be protected... an assurance from Boris Johnson... that not only would he reverse the assaults made by Ken Livingstone but he would also vigorously ensure that there will be no infringements of the original viewing corridor".
Well, we shall see, but it sounds like good news, as does the new Mayor's announced intention to spend £6m on London's parks.
A postscript
The Planning Inspector supported English Heritage's advice that the Doon Street scheme would cause serious damage to London’s most perfect 18th-century space, the magnificent courtyard of Somerset House, as well as the iconic view of Whitehall seen from the bridge over the lake in St James’s Park. The Inspector also agreed that the tower would overwhelm the grade ll* National Theatre and the setting of the grade l listed Royal Festival Hall.
However, the Secretary of State has not only overturned the advice of English Heritage as her expert advisors, but she has also chosen to decline the opinion of an independent Inspector. It is incomprehensible that her reason for doing so was because she considered that community benefits outweigh harm to the historic environment as though one must be at the sacrifice of the other. There are alternative options that would have provided the same community benefits but would have been more sensitive, without causing serious damage to historic buildings, spaces and views.
Labels: Planning
How
will the money be divided up?
How
will sites be selected to receive funding?
The
Principles of Garden Design, Tom Turner
24
Historic Styles of Garden Design, Tom Turner